![]() ![]() Instructional tutorials he's written have been linked to by organizations like The New York Times, Wirecutter, Lifehacker, the BBC, CNET, Ars Technica, and John Gruber's Daring Fireball. The news he's broken has been covered by outlets like the BBC, The Verge, Slate, Gizmodo, Engadget, TechCrunch, Digital Trends, ZDNet, The Next Web, and Techmeme. Beyond the column, he wrote about everything from Windows to tech travel tips. He founded PCWorld's "World Beyond Windows" column, which covered the latest developments in open-source operating systems like Linux and Chrome OS. ![]() He also wrote the USA's most-saved article of 2021, according to Pocket.Ĭhris was a PCWorld columnist for two years. Beyond the web, his work has appeared in the print edition of The New York Times (September 9, 2019) and in PCWorld's print magazines, specifically in the August 2013 and July 2013 editions, where his story was on the cover. With over a decade of writing experience in the field of technology, Chris has written for a variety of publications including The New York Times, Reader's Digest, IDG's PCWorld, Digital Trends, and MakeUseOf. Chris has personally written over 2,000 articles that have been read more than one billion times-and that's just here at How-To Geek. ![]() How old is your computer? If it's more than a few years old, it may not be supported by programs like Core Temp.Ĭhris Hoffman is the former Editor-in-Chief of How-To Geek.If you have a very new CPU, you may need to wait for an update to the program. Download the latest version to see if it fixes the problem. If you're using an old version of Core Temp, for example, it may not support your CPU, in which case it won't provide an accurate temperature (or possibly won't even provide a temperature at all). Make sure your programs are up-to-date.Core temperature is usually what you want to monitor, as we mentioned above. Make sure you're comparing apples to apples. Are you looking at the right sensors? If two programs don't agree, it's possible-especially on AMD machines-that one program is reporting the "Core temperature" and one is reporting the "CPU temperature".There are a lot of reasons this could happen, but here are a few things to check: Maybe it doesn't match up with another temperature-monitoring program, maybe it's absurdly low, or maybe you can't get a temperature at all. In some cases, you may find that one of the above programs doesn't quite work. What to Do If You Don't Get a Reading (or Temperatures Look Really Wrong) Here are a few settings we recommend looking at: To configure some of Core Temp's more useful features, head to Options > Settings. Max value is very important, as it ensures you're getting the correct temperature readings for your CPU. Every processor is a little different, and having an accurate Tj. To double-check, note the model name and number of your processor displayed under "Processor Information" in the Core Temp window and search for its maximum temperature online. (Usually, it's best to keep it at least 10 to 20 degrees lower than that-and even then, if you're anywhere close, it usually means something is wrong unless you've overclocked your CPU.)įor most modern CPUs, Core Temp should be able to detect the Tj. If your CPU is anywhere near that temperature, it is considered overheating. This is the highest temperature (in Celsius) at which the manufacturer has rated your CPU to run. Whether it is the stock speed for the chip, the overclocked speed from the BIOS, or whatever, the MHz returned shouldn't have anything to do with the CPU measures that are getting the percentage of total CPU cycles available that are used.Take particular note of the "TJ. Or run CoreTemp and use the CoreTemp plugin.Īt the end of the day, these are really sorta just "labels" anyway. That might show the fully tweaked speeds. You might look at running HWInfo and use the HWInfo plugin. Not sure there is anything native to Rainmeter that will see the "TurboBoost" kick. Looks like your chip's stock speed is 3401MHz, which is what Power plugin sees, you have it overclocked to 3502MHz in the BIOS, which is what the Registry sees. Right now it isn't "limiting" anything, it's just reading the stock clock speed from the chip and returning it. Certainly not the proprietary "TurboBoost" from Intel. I doubt anyone is going to tackle trying to change it to handle all the myriad of ways a system can be overclocked. Would you have any idea who could help me with this? Were these dll's developed by and for Rainmeter, or are they just implemented from other developers? Seems like the issue is in the PowerPlugin.dll file itself it prevents the meter from going over 3400Mhz (which is the stock speed for the 3570K). Twandriessen wrote:That's because the base clockspeed in the BIOS is set at 3500Mhz.Īdd some turbo (3.8) and superturbo to that you'll get about 4Ghz. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |